I’ve had a little bit of fun with Ruth Sheehan in the past, but I’d be remiss if I didn’t point you in the direction of her News & Observer column from today. I’m not sure if it’d be worse if the allegations were untrue, but I do think it would be quite disturbing. That said, I think we all hope and pray that this woman really wasn’t assaulted, much less that she was assaulted by people that are part of our community—in particular, the possibility that I may have taught one of the assailants is almost too horrible to contemplate.
The catchphrase of Greg House is “everybody lies.” As a professor, I probably get lied to at least once a day; there’s the occasional whopper, like the student I had at Millsaps who fabricated a whole conversation with me to get out of a co-curricular commitment she made, but most are rather more mundane. The whoppers are rare, but they do happen. I really don’t know whether to hope this is one of those or not.
3 comments:
I’m sensitive to RS’s life history, but does it bother anyone else that she didn’t declare this apparent conflict of interest before? How does this effect the larger debate?
Sorry (newbie mistake). She said in her last missive that she was raped 20 years ago.
And by “larger debate”, I meant the N&O bias debate among their editors. Duh, am I a blog-clod or what?