The Dean Dad has stirred up some controversy at InsideHigherEd with an op-ed supporting getting rid of tenure.
I’m not entirely sold, but I do think that the institution of tenure (coupled with the norm of rarely firing professors before tenure review) does seem to encourage highly risk-adverse behavior by employers. It probably also depresses salaries substantially. On the other hand, there are serious academic freedom arguments—at least for people who have gotten tenure—that support the institution, so I am somewhat torn.
2 comments:
Someplaces do fire pre-tenure. And not rarely, either.
There are some levers after tenure to discipline people, but they are weak. There are up or out reviews in other job such as law firms or accounting firms, I. And once you are partner, you are almost tenured-I do wonder about how different they are than the academic market. I just don’t know the facts.
True, although firing at a mid-term (third-year or fourth-year) review is much more common than a serious annual review.