Social insecurity

2005-04-30T23:19:11Z 2005-04-30T23:19:11Z Social insecurity 2005-04-30T23:19:11Z

Me, <a href="http://blog.lordsutch.com/?entryid=2450" title="Social Security for thee but not for me">three months ago</a>: <blockquote> The beauty of social security is that the public was conned into having a welfare system for seniors the only way a pluralistic society can—by turning it into a handout for everyone. That social security, and its related pal Medicare (which is universal healthcare for poor seniors, packaged as a handout for everyone), are both in serious fiscal trouble is no unforseeable accident; it’s the unavoidable consequence of a system established by Democrats to ensure these two welfare schemes wouldn’t be taken away at the ballot box, like “welfare as we know it” was and Medicaid is almost certain to be [in the future]. </blockquote> The <cite>New York Times</cite>, <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2005/05/01/politics/01social.html?ex=1272600000&en=bf53da0c88ce291e&ei=5090&partner=rssuserland&emc=rss">tomorrow</a>: <blockquote> In choosing to preserve benefits for the less well off and not raise taxes on more affluent people, Mr. Bush sought to cast himself in the Democrats’ traditional role as a defender of the poor. In his radio address on Saturday, he said: “By providing more generous benefits for low-income retirees, we’ll make good on this commitment: If you work hard and pay into Social Security your entire life, you will not retire into poverty.” But critics, including most Democratic lawmakers, say that such an approach would undermine a central bargain conceived during the New Deal: that Social Security is not just a welfare program for the poor but a form of social insurance that people at all income levels pay into and reap rewards from. “Social Security is not a poverty program, it is a retirement system people have worked hard for, paid into and have earned,” said Representative Sander M. Levin, Democrat of Michigan. If it becomes increasingly irrelevant for middle-income people, the critics warn, Social Security will eventually become little more than an empty shell. </blockquote> Most intriguing. (þ: <a href="http://vikingpundit.blogspot.com/2005/04/making-sure-bill-gates-gets-his-social.html">Eric Lindholm</a>) http://blog.lordsutch.com/archives/2712 http://blog.lordsutch.com/atom.cgi/entryid=2712