<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/css/atom.css" type="text/css"?><entry xmlns="http://purl.org/atom/ns#">
<created>2005-01-22T15:37:17Z</created>
<issued>2005-01-22T15:37:17Z</issued>
<title>Grade inflation</title>
<modified>2005-01-22T15:37:17Z</modified>
<summary></summary>
<content type="text/html" mode="escaped">&lt;p&gt;Leopold Stotch at &lt;a href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/8918"&gt;&lt;span class="caps"&gt;OTB&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt; is indignant over Princeton&amp;rsquo;s new policy of capping the number of A&amp;rsquo;s at 35% of the class. I&amp;rsquo;m a little new to academia, but I&amp;rsquo;m not sure the policy is as objectionable as he seems to think.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Administrators are limited in their ability to judge the performance of professors. The problem&amp;mdash;and the reason many administrators will default to grade distributions as a measure of grade inflation&amp;mdash;is that educational outputs aren&amp;rsquo;t easily observable, whereas grades are easily observable. To make educational outputs observable, administrators have to overcome a great deal of uncertainty and cost. The attempts include taking student surveys&amp;mdash;which, not surprisingly, are strongly correlated (positively) with grades&amp;mdash;and observing professors in class. This last item is quite expensive and may just result in the professor being on his best behavior when the auditors are present.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;One of the reasons that research universities use publication to make tenure decisions is that publication is easily observable, as is the quality of the publication (an &amp;lsquo;A&amp;rsquo; journal, &amp;lsquo;B&amp;rsquo; journal, and so forth). In any case, this is a topic that will be with us a while, if not forever.&lt;/p&gt;</content>
<link>http://blog.lordsutch.com/archives/2406</link>
<id>http://blog.lordsutch.com/atom.cgi/entryid=2406</id>
</entry>

