<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/css/atom.css" type="text/css"?><entry xmlns="http://purl.org/atom/ns#">
<created>2004-04-26T22:05:21Z</created>
<issued>2004-04-26T22:05:21Z</issued>
<title>At least Diebold isn't tabulating American Idol votes</title>
<modified>2004-04-26T22:05:21Z</modified>
<summary></summary>
<content type="text/html" mode="escaped">&lt;p&gt;Alex Knapp &lt;a href="http://www.hereticalideas.com/archives/001882.html" title="Still More Problems with E-Voting"&gt;is not at all impressed with the spread of touchscreen voting&lt;/a&gt; and thinks it will ultimately create more problems than it solves; I generally agree, especially given the less expensive and superior alternative: optical mark recognition (OMR) machines, which are essentially glorified Scantron machines that read ink circles instead of pencil marks. Put an &lt;span class="caps"&gt;OMR&lt;/span&gt; scanner or two in each precinct, and the only other equipment you need are some pens and the proper machine-readable paper ballots. Not to mention that the audit trail is trivial: all you need to do is hang on to the ballots after they&amp;rsquo;re scanned.&lt;/p&gt;</content>
<link>http://blog.lordsutch.com/archives/1548</link>
<id>http://blog.lordsutch.com/atom.cgi/entryid=1548</id>
</entry>

